Skip to main content

Asset Implementation Maturity

Summary

This page assesses the asset module across nine dimensions. The overall posture is transitional: the domain, technical, API, and database layers are implemented, while events, UI, and operations carry known gaps. Each row gives a classification, the supporting evidence, the major gap, and the review owner.

Audience

Product owners and solution architects tracking readiness, and QA engineers scoping coverage against known gaps.

Reference Content

Maturity overview

Dimension matrix

DimensionClassificationEvidenceMajor gapReview owner
BusinessImplementedDocumented behaviorNone materialproduct-owner
TechnicalImplementedAggregate + service structureNone materialasset-team
APIImplemented31 pairs, native + compatibilityNone materialbackend-team
DatabaseImplemented/Transitional7 object sets, filters, indexesCompatibility identity coexistsasset-team
EventsTransitionalOutbound six events completeInbound consumer foundationalasset-team
UIPartialHR Operations tab + ESSNo detail/assignment/return/document/timeline screensfrontend-team
OperationsTransitionalFunctional + observableMonitoring/alerting/recovery ownership unconfirmedasset-team
TroubleshootingImplementedThis documentation epicNone materialsupport-team
ReferenceImplementedThis documentation epicNone materialdocumentation-team

Source References

  • microservices/src/asset-service/Api/AssetEndpoints.cs
  • microservices/src/asset-service/Infrastructure/AssetDbContext.cs
  • microservices/src/contracts/Events/AssetLifecycleEvents.cs

See Also

Keywords

asset maturity, implementation status, gaps, transitional, readiness

Revision Information

  • Status: Draft
  • Last reviewed: 2026-07-17
  • Review cycle: Quarterly