Skip to main content

Employee Database and Migration Troubleshooting

Summary

Employee EF Core context/migrations and monolith/extracted coexistence.

Audience

  • HR administrators, support engineers, developers, QA engineers, and DevOps engineers

Symptoms

Service startup fails around migration, Employee persistence fails, or data appears inconsistent between stores.

Scope

Employee EF Core context/migrations and monolith/extracted coexistence.

Cause

Likely causes

  • Database unavailable or configuration invalid
  • Migration application failed or drift exists
  • Tenant query filter/identifier family differs from expectation
  • Monolith and extracted stores are being compared as if shared
  • Constraint or transaction failure rejected a save

Safe diagnostic steps

  1. Check startup and migration logs through approved observability
  2. Identify target store/schema ownership and route source
  3. Use migration history and sanitized read-only consistency evidence
  4. Separate aggregate-save failure from outbox/consumer behavior

Resolution

Safe resolution

  • Follow approved migration/deployment recovery owned by database/DevOps teams
  • Correct route/configuration through governed deployment
  • Reconcile through approved tooling; direct production data edits are prohibited

Validation

Service starts, health and authenticated read succeed, expected migration state is recorded, and tenant isolation holds.

Evidence to collect

Service version, migration identifier/status, safe error category, timestamp, correlation identifier, route/store owner.

Escalation

Database/DevOps owner for migration; Employee owner for model/transaction; gateway/data owners for coexistence.

Source References

  • microservices/src/employee-service/Program.cs
  • microservices/src/employee-service/Infrastructure/EmployeeDbContext.cs
  • microservices/src/employee-service/Infrastructure/Migrations/
  • Data/AppDbContext.cs

See Also

Keywords

  • Employee troubleshooting
  • Database and Migration
  • safe diagnostics

Revision Information

  • Status: Draft
  • Last reviewed: 2026-07-15
  • Review cycle: Quarterly