Performance Technical Known Limitations
Summary
Consolidated source-confirmed technical gaps and transitional boundaries.
Audience
Engineers, architects, QA, support, security reviewers, and operators working with the Performance module.
Overview
The implementation is functional but remains Transitional. The following limitations are evidenced by source rather than inferred product expectations.
Confirmed implementation
- Authorization middleware is registered but endpoint permission requirements are absent.
- Workflow and direct review ownership coexist, with failure behavior varying by environment.
- Gateway native, compatibility, and shadow boundaries coexist.
- Notification consumption exists, but recipient enrichment and delivery operations are external.
- Metrics instruments and dependency health probes are absent.
- Caching, explicit concurrency control, rate limiting, and dedicated performance monitoring are absent.
- Dedicated service unit/integration test projects and HTTP collections are absent.
- Accessibility belongs to the UI and is not demonstrated by this service source.
- Operational ownership and service objectives are not encoded.
Classification
Transitional overall; missing controls are Foundation or Not implemented as stated.
Requires confirmation
Prioritization, owners, deadlines, and acceptance criteria for each gap require confirmation.
Related Articles
See Also
Keywords
- Performance service
- Known Limitations
- Draft technical documentation
Source References
microservices/src/performance-service/Program.csmicroservices/src/performance-service/Api/PerformanceEndpoints.csmicroservices/src/performance-service/Application/Commands/AppraisalCommands.csmicroservices/src/performance-service/Application/Queries/PerformanceQueries.csmicroservices/src/performance-service/Infrastructure/PerformanceDbContext.csmicroservices/scripts/smoke-performance.ps1
Revision Information
- Status: Draft
- Last reviewed: 2026-07-16
- Review cycle: Quarterly