Skip to main content

Recruitment Future Evolution

Summary​

This page identifies evidence-backed evolution boundaries without presenting proposals as committed functionality.

Audience​

Backend and frontend engineers, architects, QA, support, security reviewers, and operators responsible for Recruitment.

Overview​

Evidence-backed evolution candidates​

  • Replace empty policy catalog with explicit native capability authorization and parity tests.
  • Define owner/team/compensation/document access scopes and public-token governance.
  • Add dependency-aware readiness, Recruitment metrics, alerts, and SLOs.
  • Add isolated unit, integration, contract, UI, compatibility, and concurrency tests.
  • Establish backfill, parity, cutover, rollback, and reconciliation assets before retiring compatibility.
  • Complete Employee login/manager mapping and cross-service recovery.
  • Add Notification consumption only with recipient, consent, template, delivery, and retry governance.
  • Decide whether reports need projections, historical snapshots, pagination, and caching.

These are Requires confirmation candidates, not roadmap commitments. API, database, events, UI, operations, troubleshooting, and reference detail belong to their later Recruitment epics.

Requires confirmation​

Production ownership, authorization policy, operational thresholds, and future design decisions require confirmation.

Source References​

  • microservices/src/recruitment-service/Api/Policies.cs
  • microservices/src/recruitment-service/Infrastructure/RecruitmentDbContext.cs
  • microservices/src/recruitment-service/Application/Common/Gateways.cs
  • microservices/src/gateway-api/Program.cs

See Also​

Keywords​

  • Recruitment technical architecture
  • Recruitment Service
  • Future Evolution

Revision Information​

  • Status: Draft
  • Last reviewed: 2026-07-16
  • Review cycle: Quarterly